Mortgage Broker Or Direct Lender?

Use the tools below to copy the article in plain text form, or you can copy it as HTML, ready to copy and paste directly into a web page.

HTML
<html> <head> <title>Mortgage Broker Or Direct Lender?</title> </head> <body> <h1>Mortgage Broker Or Direct Lender?</h1> <div class="body">Copyright 2006 Paul Jerome<br /> <br /> Which is preferable – the mortgage broker or the direct lender? The answer will vary depending on whom you ask. The broker touts a variety of sources and claims that this yields the most favorable loan terms. The lender says that the mortgage broker is just a middleman and if you go directly to the lender then you'll avoid paying broker fees. If you walk into a store that sells blue shoes, then I'm sure you'll hear that blue shoes are your color and if you walk into a red shoe store then, conversely, red shoes are more becoming. And as this author is typing, he is wondering whether you think he works at the red shoe store or blue. I'll tell you that I've worked at both and I'm not impartial; but, rather than giving you my opinion, I'll present some facts. Pay attention, 'cause the red shoe store charges too much.<br /> <br /> Wholesale Access (<A href="http://wholesaleaccess.com/">wholesaleaccess.com</A>) reports that mortgage brokers originated 68% of all mortgage loans in 2004. While this is certainly an impressive statistic - bigger does not always equate better. The real question is whether or not borrowers pay lower rates and fees on mortgages originated through brokers or on mortgages originated by direct lenders. The answer can be found in a study of data from (Q3) 1995 through (Q1) 2002. This data set was supplied by American Financial Services Association and is so encompassing that it accounted for approximately 40% of all subprime originations in 1998. The results are published in a 2004 paper titled Mortgage Brokers And The Subprime Market (<A href="http://ftc.gov/be/seminardocs/0405elliehausen.pdf">ftc.gov/be/seminardocs/0405elliehausen.pdf</A>). Please refer to the top of the first page, which effectually states that this paper can't be quoted. In compliance with this directive, I shall direct you to the conclusion on page ten of the document. The first sentence can be translated as (and I don't quote) - loans originated by mortgage brokers cost less than loans originated by the creditors. That difference was quantified (page 9) as 1.132% cost savings for those who used mortgage brokers on a first mortgage and 1.973% cost savings for those who utilized mortgage brokers on a second mortgage. There you have it! On average, it is cheaper to work with a mortgage broker than going directly to the lender; but there's still more to tell. Let's talk about these broker fees.<br /> <br /> A broker by definition introduces buyers and sellers – by all intents and purposes, yes a middleman. The misnomer in this equation is the fundamental difference between wholesale and retail. Take for example, a lender that is in one geographical area of the country and seeks diversification of its portfolio of mortgages through the origination of loans in another state. The lender has two choices. The first is to open a retail office in that state, hire staff, buy equipment, advertise and absorb all of the associated overhead as an expense to originate retail mortgage loans that he can ultimately service. The second option is for that lender to contract with a mortgage brokerage that incurs the expense of finding the client and also originates, processes and packages the loan for submission to that lender's wholesale department. With the second option, the lender forgoes the expenses listed above and is willing to offer the mortgage broker a wholesale price in return. The broker has this same type of wholesale relationship with numerous lenders and competition among the lenders drives prices down for the broker. Yes, the broker charges a rate or fee that is higher than its wholesale cost but (as the 2004 study reveals) that rate and fee combination is still considerably lower than the retail cost charged by direct lenders.<br /> <br /> In conclusion, I hope this article has shed some light on the difference between wholesale/retail, brokers/lenders, and blue and red shoes. Just to recap: wholesale is better than retail, brokers are better than lenders, and there is compelling evidence to explain why 68% of us prefer blue shoes.<br /> <br /> <br /> ------<br /> <br /> Paul Jerome is a mortgage expert and frequent contributor to the Broken Credit Blog. The BCB is a free website created to assist the general public with information regarding credit repair and responsible mortgage lending.<br /> <A href="http://www.brokencredit.com/">http://www.brokencredit.com</A><br /> </div> <div class="source">Article Source: <a href="http://www.a1articles.com/mortgage-broker-or-direct-lender-92355.html">http://www.a1articles.com/mortgage-broker-or-direct-lender-92355.html</a></div> <div class="author"> <div class="authorBio"></div> </author> </body> </html>

Text
Mortgage Broker Or Direct Lender? Author: Copyright 2006 Paul Jerome Which is preferable – the mortgage broker or the direct lender? The answer will vary depending on whom you ask. The broker touts a variety of sources and claims that this yields the most favorable loan terms. The lender says that the mortgage broker is just a middleman and if you go directly to the lender then you'll avoid paying broker fees. If you walk into a store that sells blue shoes, then I'm sure you'll hear that blue shoes are your color and if you walk into a red shoe store then, conversely, red shoes are more becoming. And as this author is typing, he is wondering whether you think he works at the red shoe store or blue. I'll tell you that I've worked at both and I'm not impartial; but, rather than giving you my opinion, I'll present some facts. Pay attention, 'cause the red shoe store charges too much. Wholesale Access (wholesaleaccess.com) reports that mortgage brokers originated 68% of all mortgage loans in 2004. While this is certainly an impressive statistic - bigger does not always equate better. The real question is whether or not borrowers pay lower rates and fees on mortgages originated through brokers or on mortgages originated by direct lenders. The answer can be found in a study of data from (Q3) 1995 through (Q1) 2002. This data set was supplied by American Financial Services Association and is so encompassing that it accounted for approximately 40% of all subprime originations in 1998. The results are published in a 2004 paper titled Mortgage Brokers And The Subprime Market (ftc.gov/be/seminardocs/0405elliehausen.pdf). Please refer to the top of the first page, which effectually states that this paper can't be quoted. In compliance with this directive, I shall direct you to the conclusion on page ten of the document. The first sentence can be translated as (and I don't quote) - loans originated by mortgage brokers cost less than loans originated by the creditors. That difference was quantified (page 9) as 1.132% cost savings for those who used mortgage brokers on a first mortgage and 1.973% cost savings for those who utilized mortgage brokers on a second mortgage. There you have it! On average, it is cheaper to work with a mortgage broker than going directly to the lender; but there's still more to tell. Let's talk about these broker fees. A broker by definition introduces buyers and sellers – by all intents and purposes, yes a middleman. The misnomer in this equation is the fundamental difference between wholesale and retail. Take for example, a lender that is in one geographical area of the country and seeks diversification of its portfolio of mortgages through the origination of loans in another state. The lender has two choices. The first is to open a retail office in that state, hire staff, buy equipment, advertise and absorb all of the associated overhead as an expense to originate retail mortgage loans that he can ultimately service. The second option is for that lender to contract with a mortgage brokerage that incurs the expense of finding the client and also originates, processes and packages the loan for submission to that lender's wholesale department. With the second option, the lender forgoes the expenses listed above and is willing to offer the mortgage broker a wholesale price in return. The broker has this same type of wholesale relationship with numerous lenders and competition among the lenders drives prices down for the broker. Yes, the broker charges a rate or fee that is higher than its wholesale cost but (as the 2004 study reveals) that rate and fee combination is still considerably lower than the retail cost charged by direct lenders. In conclusion, I hope this article has shed some light on the difference between wholesale/retail, brokers/lenders, and blue and red shoes. Just to recap: wholesale is better than retail, brokers are better than lenders, and there is compelling evidence to explain why 68% of us prefer blue shoes. ------ Paul Jerome is a mortgage expert and frequent contributor to the Broken Credit Blog. The BCB is a free website created to assist the general public with information regarding credit repair and responsible mortgage lending. http://www.brokencredit.com Article Source: http://www.a1articles.com/mortgage-broker-or-direct-lender-92355.html About the Author:

Article Title:
Article Keywords:

return to article