Who wins - LCD or Plasma?

Let me first say that the technology in question is very different. Processing and manipulation of the picture is dealt with in very different ways.This essay is going to concentrate more on how the consumers experience differs.

so here are a few important facts to help you form your choice ...

Dimensions

Competition between LCD and Plasma is in the main in the screen size of 37-50 ins. But in reality the LCD does not often go beyond 45 ins, which simply means that if you want a bigger size, you will need to choose a Plasma. In contrast, in the smaller sizes (15 to 36 ins), your only choice is LCD, as plasmas are not made in these smaller sizes.


Image Quality / Contrast / Saturation

Plasma and LCD TV's are capable each of dishing out fantastic picture quality. Plasma nevertheless is better for use in a home cinema set-up. Indeed, the structure of plasma allows them to get deep blacks: for picture information that has very little brightness, the contrast and sharpness is far superior.

In comparison, it is difficult for LCD to get very deep blacks (it always has a small amount of light between the pixels). This does not mean that LCD technology is not worthy for TV screens: a lot of advancement in this regard has been made and you now see LCD TV's with top-notch contrast and good quality deep blacks.

The colour situation is a very similar story, the plasma again is more fit to provide richer more realistic colours due to it's inherent structure, and uncover much more brilliant colors. LCD's Even So have the upper hand when it comes to contrast boasting lovely sharp pictures.

Watching at extreeme angles

Plasma TVs broadly speaking have greater viewing angles. It is right that the current LCD manage to obtain angles of 160 ° / 170 ° (vertical / horizontal), which is very good. LCD TV's have a more evident image deterioration curve when viewed at an angle than the plasma.

The effect of grid

Only plasmas have this particular problem. If an image is left sitting still on the screen for an extended length of time the pixels can burn and cause everlasting damage (phosphorous in the panel is burnt and aged prematurely). This phenomenon appears particularly in the first 200 hours of use, and these burns are unfortunately irreversible.

Lifetime

The half life of LCD TV's are in the neighborhood of between fifty and sixty 1000 hours of viewing, thirty to sixty thousand for a plasma. essentially this translates to about fourteen years of TV usage (six hours per day as a rough gauge), Be conscious that you will not be able to recondition your gas plasma screen or retrieve dead pixels on your LCD. The only choice is to renew the screen.

Speed Response

Some earlier LCD sets have a very slow response at higher frame rates:the rendering of are poor as a result. Even So LCD technology has made much advancement in this area: the performance difference between Plasma and LCD is much less apparent today.

Power Consumption

Plasmas use up to thirty percent more electrical energy than their LCD cousins on averageThe Price

LCD TVs are still slightly more costly than Plasma. The reason: the production of LCD's is much more costly than plasma, particularly in large sizes.

Make your choice

We believe there is a market for both plasma and LCD. Plasma TVs offer larger screens for an affordable price and deep blacks, LCD's Even So do not from screen burn and use less energy.

To conclude, each have their pros and cons and should be chosen according to your individual requirements.

If you are enticed in a Tv that is ideal for the kitchen then look at this review
buy-sonykdl-26v4000