Many now-web-savvy folks will be forgiven for not recognizing the "personal" potential of the Internet right at first. In the mid-1990s, as the AOL diskettes and CDs starting clogging grocery aisles and mailboxes everywhere, it seemed that regular folks were supposed to be on "this side" of the digital divide, consuming goods and visiting portals run by the "real companies" on "the other side" of it.
AOL did as much as anyone to (Warning: Cliché Alert) democratize the World Wide Web by allotting its customers a little bit of then-precious server space for "personal pages." It wasn't much space, you had to use their built-in tools and the URL could be a mite unwieldy. On the other hand, it was free, right? (Actually, wrong. You had to have a paid AOL account to get it, so it wasn't really free, was it?) In any event, it was a way to get your own stories and photos (or, perhaps, lies and retouched self-portraits) online for at least a few million people to see. It was a start.
That was then, this is now
What a start it was. Along with everything else that pushed the Internet forward, including the modern equivalent of dirty French postcards, it wasn't long before people were seeing the sort of supersonic progress they were used to seeing in computers, telecommunications, movie special effects and recorded music. Then the few paid hosting firms became an entire market segment, and with every rung up the ladder of progress and commerce the tech got faster, the results got better and the price got cheaper. Also, the millions of users turned into billions.
That's progress. The freebie hosting plans really didn't have to make as much progress as the paid ones, though, because the market for freebie sites no longer attracts people who want real functionality (now that they have a choice). That is to say, free hosting was for a long time a decent way to get a travelogue or personal photo site up for the world to see. Now there's Flickr and YouTube and a zillion ways to get pics and vids online without having a website or a host of any kind, and without paying much (or anything), either.
The reasons
So, just what are the reasons to choose a professional web host vs. the free hosting that's available? There are plenty, actually, but we'll stick with the major ones, in no particular order:
There are very few people who would be better off with a free site than a paid one, including grandparents who just want to post kiddie pics. A free plan can only be justified if the site and its contents are of nearly zero value. If there is even the slightest reason for you to ensure that your site is up all the time and working right, you need to skip a couple of lattes each month and get with the program.
With the incredible amount of disk space, bandwidth and social/economic/cultural cachet that comes with paying for your own domain to be hosted, there just aren't many reasons not to do it. For anyone in business, at any level with any product or service, a free hosting plan is absolutely out of the question when $10 a month gets you what $100 a month did in the 1990s. The fact is, paid hosting just may be the best bargain in the (real and virtual) world today.
Amy Armitage is the head of Business Development for Lunarpages. Lunarpages provides quality web hosting from their US-based hosting facility. They offer a wide-range of services from linux virtual private servers and managed solutions to shared and reseller hosting plans.
| Report this article |